Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Rubin

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeon D. Lazer, J.

In this action by a wife for judgment declaring her separation agreement with the defendant void and for a divorce, she moves for financial discovery. Her husband vigorously opposes the relief sought in the motion as impermissible.

Section 250 of the Domestic Relations Law (L 1975, ch 690) declares that in a matrimonial action in which alimony is in issue "there shall be compulsory disclosure by both parties of their respective financial states. No showing of special circumstances shall be required before such disclosure is ordered.” The Appellate Division, First Department, has had no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Plancher v. PlancherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Plancher v. PlancherNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Billet v. BilletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Perse v. PerseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Hoppl v. HopplAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Department of Social Services v. GabrielNew York City Family Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API