State v. Ingram
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal presents three questions for disposition. First, we address whether, in those instances in which lesser-included offenses are already charged in the indictment, a trial court nevertheless must instruct the jury that accomplices may have a different state of mind than principals and, thus, may be liable only for the lesser-included offenses. Second, we determine whether the prosecutor misstated the applicability of the statutory affirmative defense to felony murder. Finally, we consider whether, when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from trial, it is error for the trial…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. CassadySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State v. Anthony K. Cole (076255) (Middlesex and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. Amir Randolph(076506) (Hudson County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.