Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 21, 2008No. A-58/59 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal presents three questions for disposition. First, we address whether, in those instances in which lesser-included offenses are already charged in the indictment, a trial court nevertheless must instruct the jury that accomplices may have a different state of mind than principals and, thus, may be liable only for the lesser-included offenses. Second, we determine whether the prosecutor misstated the applicability of the statutory affirmative defense to felony murder. Finally, we consider whether, when a defendant voluntarily absents himself from trial, it is error for the trial…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. CassadySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. State v. Anthony K. Cole (076255) (Middlesex and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  3. State v. Amir Randolph(076506) (Hudson County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API