Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1991No. Docket 118933, 119006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.

This is a declaratory judgment action. Defendants Sally and Gordon Roberts and Bridgett Allen appeal as of right from a judgment finding that Allen was not insured with plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

On September 29, 1986, Sally Roberts suffered serious injuries as the result of an automobile accident. She was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by her daughter, Bridgett Allen. Both parties had been insured by State Farm. Roberts agreed to a $10,000 settlement with State Farm under her uninsured motorist coverage.

She…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Wood EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Widmayer v. LeonardMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Koopman v. LoganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isabella County Department of Social Services v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Price v. Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Tammy Headworth v. Charles William KempMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API