Legal Opinion

Application of Warren Francis Carey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of the sole remaining claim of appellant’s application entitled “Urological Compositions.”1

The invention is adequately described in the claim:

6. The method of combating bacterial urinary tract infection in a host subject thereto which comprises orally administering to said host in dosage unit form about 100 to about 400 mg. of 1- (5-nitrof urylideneamino) -2-imi-dazolidone.

The references relied upon are:

Gever et al. (Gever) 2,746,960 May 22 1956

Mintzer et al. (Mintzer), Antibiotics…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Bernhard W. A. Weber and Hugh D. McLeeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Manuel F. LeonorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of Manuel F. LeonorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Application of Warren Francis CareyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API