Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff was hurt by stepping into a *619hole in the surface of Summer Street, Boston. On the evidence most favorable to her, the hole was shaped like a triangle, measuring about eighteen or nineteen inches- at the base and about eight to twelve inches on the sides. It was “worn off at the edges, started at street level and gradually went down to a depth of two inches and went up again,” being “sort of saucer shape.” “It was worn on the outer ehd a-nd had tapered to the center and there was a piece of car track in a part of the hole.” The street was thirty-six or thirty-seven feet wide,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Sears v. Town of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Crowell v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Callagy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Isaacson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Hanson v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Albert M. Buskey v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Green v. Town of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API