Legal Opinion

Theodore Kagen Corp., a Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 29, 1960No. 15541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Oral testimony together with exhibits convinced the Commission that base-metal bezels of petitioners’ watch cases could be mistaken for precious metals, because of their appearance, in the absence of clear disclosure to the contrary. Substantial evidence supports this finding. The Commission ordered petitioners to cease “Offering for sale or selling watch cases composed in whole or in part of base metal which has been treated to simulate precious metal, without clearly disclosing on such cases the true metal composition of such treated eases or parts.” Commission counsel advised us in oral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee W. Todd v. Albert JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benrus Watch Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Benrus Watch Company, Inc., a Corporation, Belforte Watch Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Oscar M. Lazrus, Individually and as an Officer of Aforesaid Corporations, and Harvey M. Bond, Stanley M. Karp, Samuel M. Feldberg, Jay K. Lazrus, Robert Weil, Martin J. Rasnow, Leo Hyman, and Julian Lazrus, Individually and as Officers of Benrus Watch Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Clifford Seigmeister v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API