Legal Opinion

Richaud v. Jennings

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1993No. F017162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, Acting P. J.

In this appeal from a consent judgment entered in favor of respondent in a medical malpractice action, appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting respondent’s motion in limine to exclude from the trial any expert testimony of appellant’s only orthopedic expert. We affirm.

Facts

Plaintiff and appellant Jerry Ann Richaud filed a medical malpractice action against defendant and respondent W. Kenneth Jennings, M.D., on or about January 16, 1990. Respondent answered the complaint on or about March 21, 1990, and trial of the matter was set for August 26, 1991.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bonds v. RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beverly Hospital v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Miranda v. National Emergency Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Pina v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Chancellor v. Ozzello CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API