Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mannix v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1915No. 3,701PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Supervisory control by tbe State, on tbe relation of Con Man-nix, against tbe District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District in and for tbe county of Broadwater and others.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Supervisory control. W. B. Dolenty died testate in Broad-water county in 1910, and on November 22 of that year tbe district court of tbe fourteenth district, sitting at Townsend, in Broadwater county, having jurisdiction of the estate, admitted tbe will to probate, and in accordance with tbe wish of tbe decedent as expressed therein, appointed Isabel Dolenty, the surviving wife, executrix. As required by tbe order of appointment, she gave bond in tbe sum of $50,000. Since that time tbe estate has been in process of administration. Though, as shown by tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fisher v. . HepburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Sutton v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Dolenty's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Crawford v. PierseMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. In Re Jennings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Peel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Sinko v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API