Legal Opinion

Champenois v. White

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1828PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to set aside ca. sa. During the last May term, a fi. fa. was issued in this cause, by virtue of which a levy was made on sundry articles of personal property, to an amount nearly or quite sufficient to satisfy the execution.

Read the full summary

Motion to set aside ca. sa. During the last May term, a fi. fa. was issued in this cause, by virtue of which a levy was made on sundry articles of personal property, to an amount nearly or quite sufficient to satisfy the execution. A few days afterwards, the deputy sheriff who had made the levy, was informed by the sheriff that a fi.fa. in another cause against the defendant, had come to his hands previous to the receipt of the execution by the deputy, for an amount exceeding the value of the property; on receiving which information, the deputy returned the fi. fa. in this cause, nulla bona,…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

There was no irregularity in this case. The return of nulla bona was a true return; there were no goods to satisfy the execution issued in this cause. The motion is denied with costs.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Evans v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Honeywell v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Beardsley v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. The People v. . AmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Rogers v. DickeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1844

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API