Legal Opinion

Keepnews Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 7, 1964No. 68922; protest 61/21472 (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest involves certain colored glass articles in the form of fish,' ducks, roosters, and pheasants. They were classified as blown glass articles under paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51898, and assessed with duty either at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem, or at 50 cents each, depending upon whether they are valued over or under $1 each. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 218(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ardalt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API