Desert Sun Publishing Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
In this case we hold that the publication of a letter, which, in substance, charges a candidate for public office with engaging in political chicanery is protected by the First Amendment.
In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 at page 270 [11 L.Ed.2d 686 at page 701, 84 S.Ct. 710, 95 A.L.R.2d 1412], the Supreme Court observed that this country has “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
- Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Washington Post Co. v. ChalonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
3Cited by30 opinions
- Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Baker v. Los Angeles Herald ExaminerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Rosenaur v. SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Beilenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.