Legal Opinion

Potter v. Indiana & Lake Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Case. Both parties bring error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of an undivided half interest in five University lots, numbered 14, 16, 17, 24, and 25, located in a marsh on the left bank of the St. Joseph river, near its mouth. Each lot contains five acres. The lots are situated on section 24, township 4 S., range 19 W., and, with 25 similar lots, comprise the S. W. of said section. This land was granted by the United States to the State of Michigan for University purposes, and in 1842 was divided and platted into lots for sale. Plaintiff *391became tbe purchaser in 1881. The defendant’s road was-constructed in 1888. In October, 1890,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. O'Brien v. Norwich & Worcester Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Lepire v. KlenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bowman v. McGoldrick Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Swain v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API