Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1896No. 17,748PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellant was prosecuted by affidavit and information, for a violation of the provisions of sections 7 and 9 of the act relating to ware-housemen and warehouse receipts, etc., approved March 25, 1879; Acts 1879, p. 231; sections 8726, 8728, K, S. 1894 (sections 6547, 6549, R. S. 1881).

It is charged in the information that on or about the 30th day of October, 1893, the appellant was a storage merchant and warehouseman in Kosciusko *403county, and then and there held himself out to the public as a person keeping and operating a storage room and warehouse for receiving in store and caring for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. HenzellIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Drudge v. LeiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Peak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Gibson v. KINCAIDIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API