Legal Opinion
State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 1974No. 1331PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of the unlawful distribution of heroin. Section 54-11-20, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, 1973 Supp.). He appeals. We affirm.
Defendant contends (1) improper extension of time granted under Rule 37, and (2) refusal of defendant’s instruction on entrapment, and closing argument on this issue.(1) Court of Appeals cannot review orders of the Supreme Court.
Defendant contends that the Supreme Court improperly granted an extension of time under Rule 37(c) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure [§ 41-23-37(c), N. M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6, 1973 Supp.)].…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. AkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Gandara Ex Rel. Gandara v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Salazar v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. Porras-FuerteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.