Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2009No. 1071189 and 1071239Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

The main opinion concludes that the lack of consideration to the wife forecloses consideration of the claim against Fletcher Mitchell Smith, personal representative of her estate, as an ex contractu claim. Consideration is not always necessary for a claim to be considered contractual in nature. This is such a case.

First, I am of the view that it is the law, not the bargaining and exchanges between the parties, that made the wife’s obligations under the power of attorney contractual in nature. That is, the law simply treats the wife’s undertaking as contractual in nature; it imputed to her, by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. Alabama Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sevigny v. NEW SOUTH FEDERAL SAV. & LOANSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Dudley v. Colonial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Myers v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API