Murray v. Peterson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note wherein there had been an original provision for an attorney’s fee of five per cent, upon the amount due upon said note in case suit should be instituted to collect the same. Prior to the commencement of the action, plaintiff conceded that the provision for an attorney’s fee of five per cent, had been changed to fifteen per cent, by writing a figure 1 immediately before the figure 5. In the first complaint the note was declared upon in its changed form. By permission of the court an amended…
2Cited by6 opinions
- City of Fairhaven v. CowgillWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Thompson v. StackWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Edwards v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lohman v. ReymondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- Mathias v. LeathersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.