Legal Opinion
Moe v. New York City Department of Probation
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Irving S. Aronin, J.
Petitioner, Alonzo Moe, seeks to compel the New York City Department of Probation (hereinafter referred to as respondent) to perform its "ministerial duty” of not making available to any person sealed records, and not referring to such records in the investigation report of petitioner (CPLR art 78).1
On December 4, 1984, petitioner made an admission in Family Court to acts, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery in the third degree. Subsequently, at the dispositional hearing, petitioner was placed on probation. In December…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. FelixNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. DooleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988