Michael v. Donohoe
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by J. C. Michael against M. E. Donohoe and others. From a judgment abating the action, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Ritz, Judge :
On the 1st of September, 1913, the defendant M. E. Donohoe, who was at that time M. E. Durkin, and one Jessie E. Michael, the assignor of the plaintiff, were partners in business. On that day the defendant Mrs. Durkin, now Mrs. Donohoe, bought the interest of Mrs. Michael in the stock of goods, and executed to her in payment therefor the note sued on in this case, which is in the words and figures following:
“$TO.50. Sept. 1 1913.
When the partnership heretofore existing between Mrs. M. E. Durkin and Mrs. Jesse E. Michael, under the firm name and style of M. E. Durkin & Co., has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fort v. GoodingNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Phipps v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Baxter v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Beall v. Hudson County Water Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1911
- Toombs v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perine v. PerineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
- Setzer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927