Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

P. v. Nunez & Satele

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2013No. S091915PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

A jury convicted defendants Daniel Nunez and William Tupua Satele of the first degree murders of Renesha Ann Fuller and Edward Robinson. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.) The jury also found true special circumstance allegations of multiple murder (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(3)), and sentence enhancement allegations that defendants committed the murders to benefit a criminal street gang and used firearms to commit them. (§§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1), 12022.53, subd. (d).) Special circumstance allegations that defendants intentionally killed the victims because of their race (§…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. Romero and SelfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API