Legal Opinion

In Re the Revocation of the Driver's License of Hopewell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1985No. 14742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Acting Justice.

Richard J. Hopewell (appellant) appeals from a trial court order revoking his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical analysis test, pursuant to our implied consent law, SDCL 32-23-10 and SDCL 32-23-11. We affirm.

On June 30, 1983, at approximately 11:30 p.m., while on routine patrol in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Officer Joe Godsk (Godsk) observed a vehicle driving down the center of the street in a westerly direction. The vehicle veered from left to right and its wheels crossed the center line. Godsk followed the vehicle to an intersection, whereupon he…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BaysingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re the Revocation of the Driver License of KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re the Driver's License Revocation of MaloneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BaysingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API