Legal Opinion

Crookshank v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1929No. 6471Published

1Opinion of the Court

"Woods, Judge:

The plaintiff, W. B. Crookshank, complains of judgment entered by the circuit court of Kanawha county upon a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company.

The action was brought to recover damages for the destruction of the plaintiff’s automobile at a public crossing of defendant’s railway tracks immediately west of its station in Charleston, by a west bound passenger train. The plaintiff, accompanied by Dr. C. N. Watts, was traveling westward in the automobile from Charleston to St. Albans, a distance of from twelve to fifteen miles. According to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cavendish v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Louisville & I. R. v. SchuesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Gundlach v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API