Legal Opinion

Hibernia Insurance v. Malevinsky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1894No. 471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

Appellant states the nature and result of the suit, which appellee accepts as correct, as follows:

1 ‘ This is a suit brought by the appellee in the District Court of Travis County, on September 27, 1889, for §1250 claimed to be due under an, insurance policy issued by the appellant on October 4, 1888, for the term-of one year, on a stock of general merchandise, situated in the city of Austin, Texas, and which was partially destroyed by fire, damaging same 110,000.

“Appellee further alleged, that the amount of concurrent insurance permitted by his policy, as written,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. East Texas Fire Insurance v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Mutual Protective Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Schmurr v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v. BrittainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. First Texas State Ins. Co. v. CapeirsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API