Legal Opinion
State v. Bishop
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1986No. 19733, 19797 and 19847Published
1Opinion of the Court
717 P.2d 261 (1986)
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Douglas D. BISHOP, Defendant and Appellant. (Three Cases)
Nos. 19733, 19797 and 19847.
Supreme Court of Utah.
March 31, 1986.
Gregory M. Warner, of Alrich, Nelson, Weight & Esplin, Provo, for defendant and appellant.
David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Sandra Sjogren, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
STEWART, Justice:
The defendant was found guilty and mentally ill on three counts of sodomy on a child in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-403.1 in three separate trials and sentenced to three concurrent…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.