Legal Opinion

Adams v. Adams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 2006No. Nos. 3D06-413, 3D06-152, 3D06-154, 3D05-3002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Order to Show Cause

2Per curiam

On the Court’s own motion, the Court issued an order to Danny Lee Adams to show cause why the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis should not be revoked for abuse of the judicial system. See Attwood v. State, Dep't of Corr., 660 So.2d 358, 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The appellant is engaged in postjudgment litigation arising out of a dissolution of marriage. He has filed fifteen appeals or petitions in this Court since 2002. The Court may deny in forma pauperis status for litigants who abuse the judicial system. See id. at 360.

On review of appellant Danny Lee Adams’…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grafman v. GrafmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Attwood v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Little Arch Creek Properties, Inc. v. Medical Facilities Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Philip Morris Inc. v. JettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaskins v. BahourDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API