Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Odom

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 1934No. 13934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. C. T. Graydon, Acting Associate Justice.

E. A. Odom and R. E. Foil, defendants-respondents, signed a replevin bond in a claim and delivery action. A. P. Setzer, plaintiff-appellant, brought action upon this bond on September 5, 1933. A motion was made to make the complaint more definite and certain in certain particulars, which was granted, and the plaintiff, Setzer, brought another action on January 13, 1934, without complying with the order to make more definite and certain. To this second complaint the defendants demurred on February 12, 1934, on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Barnwell CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  2. Frick Company, Inc. v. DeiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Green v. Anderson Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Smith v. J. F. Prettyman & SonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Spearwant Liquidating Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. Wilder, Clerk of CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Kirk v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Setzer v. FoilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API