Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Nolan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Palo Alto District Court —Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. This is an action at law by which the plaintiff seeks to recover of the defendant the value of a stock of millinery goods. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Rothrock, J.—

I. The cause has once before been in this court upon appeal by defendants. It was reversed and remanded for a new trial, because we thought that, as matter of law, it was the right of the defendants to have the question as to the good faith with which plaintiff claimed to be tlie owner of the goods submitted to the jury. Another trial has been had, in which the jury have passed upon that question, and the case is here again upon forty-one assigned errors, which we will proceed to determine’so far as they have been argued; and, as the case involves only the plainest questions of…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson & Co. v. BerkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Wilson v. ElseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Canfield ex rel. Canfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. McDivitt v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Erb v. German American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API