Legal Opinion

Rea v. Rea

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 1978No. 1997-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Jack Rea appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the widow and estate of his deceased brother Ed in a suit to collect funds unpaid on a verbal loan agreement between the brothers.

The principal issues are (1) whether the court erred in submitting the issue of the statute of limitations to the jury and (2) whether the court erred in denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

No error is assigned to the instructions1 on the grounds they misstated the law.2 Instead, Jack's position is that the *498court should have decided as a matter of law that his claim was brought within the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hargis v. Sewell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  5. Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bucktown Partners v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Jewell v. LongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. David R. Duncan v. Lawrence ArataCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API