Legal Opinion

Runge v. DeKeyrel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1981No. 81-105Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SCOTT

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellants and their predecessors in title have owned and occupied land on one side of an old fence, mostly hedge, for more than 20 years. Appellee and his predecessors in title have owned and occupied the land on the other side of the fence. The fence had been considered the boundary line between the two parcels of land for at least 50 years.

Appellants commenced an action to have the division fence between the two properties moved between 14 and 25 feet on the basis that the fence did not represent the true and correct boundary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLeod v. LambdinIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rhodes v. SiglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Pliske v. YuskisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Kandlik v. HudekIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Patient v. StiefAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API