Legal Opinion

Fall River Whaling Co. v. Borden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petitions to this court as a court of chancery under section 18 of the Insolvent Act, St. 1838, c. 163. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, by

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

These cases have been submitted upon learned and elaborate printed arguments; and they came before the court in virtue of the general superintendence and jurisdiction conferred by the statutes for the relief of insolvent debtors, which empower us in all cases arising under those acts, and upon the petition of any party aggrieved in the premises, to hear and determine the matter as a court of chancery, and to make such order therein as law and justice shall require. 1838, c. 163, § 18. How far, precisely, the jurisdiction thus granted to this court extends, has not yet been decided. Suffice it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barbell v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Pitts v. WaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  3. Whitwell v. WyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. LawlisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API