Legal Opinion

Colorado State Board of Pharmacy v. Hallett

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 9, 1931No. 12,479PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This is an action by our state board of pharmacy against the defendant, Hallett, an unlicensed druggist, to recover the penalty prescribed by our general pharmacy act for selling poisons in violation of its provisions. The defendant filed a motion to strike from the files the complaint and the appearance of Ab H. Romans, district attorney, and his deputy, and D. F. Clifford, an attorney who purported to represent the plaintiff in bringing and prosecuting the action. The trial court treated this motion as one to abate or quash the proceedings and held section 4597, C. L. 1921, as amended by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People ex rel. Gullett v. McCulloughIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Thomas v. GoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  4. People v. CasiasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Douglas M. Costle, State of Colorado Ex Rel. J. D. MacFarlane Petitioner-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API