Rubin v. Rubin

We affirm the order appealed in all respects, except one. We reverse that portion of the order finding E.S. Rubin in contempt because the trial court failed to *779make a specific finding that the former husband’s conduct was willful. See Washburn v. Washburn, 647 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.