Legal Opinion

Reinig v. Laehy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying respondents’ motion to dismiss this CPLR article 78 petition. The collective bargaining agreement between the parties provides a four-step grievance process culminating in arbitration which applies to any dispute which relates to “application, meaning and interpretation” of the agreement. This dispute, as to whether respondents were required to give petitioner notice and a hearing prior to docking him one-half day’s pay, is clearly encompassed by the collective bargaining agreement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baran v. OtterbeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API