Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Emery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Jimmie Eugene Emery and Nicholas Emery appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated March 30, 1999, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendants Valerie Diehl and Daniel Dugan raised triable issues of fact sufficient to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Chemical Corp. v. United Sterling Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mackenzie v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Republic Chemical Corp. v. United Sterling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pyke v. BachanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Matter of Ibn I.-A. (Genesee County Dept. of Social Servs.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Matter of Ibn I.-A. (Genesee County Dept. of Social Servs.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API