Legal Opinion

State v. Bearcub

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

The defendants, before their marriage, were jointly indicted under ORS 418.140, for unlawfully sharing public assistance.

They demurred separately to the indictment on grounds that no crime was stated and that every statute can embrace only one subject and this statute is “buried in a chapter relating to child welfare services.” Each demurrer was sustained.

ORS 418.140 provides: •

“(1) No male person over the age of 18 years * * * shall habitually accept subsistence or lodging in the dwelling place of any female householder, who is the recipient of aid * * *.”

Sandra contends that only-a male can…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CaseOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. FraserOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API