Legal Opinion

Leaycraft & Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 13, 1904No. 156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

The importations in controversy were arrowroot in its starchy form, answering the dictionary definitions, which describe it as “a nutritive starch obtained from the root stalk” of several species of the maranta, “a plant which grows in the West Indies, and which was considered a specific for the wounds caused by poisoned arrows; hence its name.” “In its preparation the tubers are mashed, and the pulp soaked in water. This dissolves out the starch, which is separated from the fibers by settling, and the water is then drawn off, and the starch cleansed, and finally dried…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. Zanmati & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Bronston Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API