Legal Opinion

Ferrara v. Auric Mining Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1905No. 3104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the District Court of Pueblo County on Motion to Require Cost Bond, and Cross Motion to Sue In Forma Pauperis.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

Defendant in error moved the court to require of plaintiff , in error a cost bond. Plaintiff in error confessed the motion, and filed a cross motion for leave to sue as a poor person. The cause has been submitted upon plaintiff in error’s motion.

Such applications have been repeatedly ruled upon in our supreme court. While there are no reported decisions of the rulings the holding of that court has frequently and uniformly been that sec. 676,1 Mills’ Ann. Stats., permitting courts in certain cases to allow parties to sue as poor persons does not apply to that court. The ruling is equally…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Almarez v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Bell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API