Hancock v. . Southgate
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.
The main assignments of errors by the defendant T. S. Southgate are: (1) refusal to nonsuit plaintiffs at close of plaintiffs’ evidence; (2) refusal to nonsuit plaintiffs at close of all the evidence.
No summons has been served on J. C. Malbon and Elias Ethridge. The defendant G. D. Potter was served with summons, but filed no answer, and admits liability. The only question involved in this appeal is the liability of T. S. Southgate.
The evidence, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiffs, on the motion of nonsuit, at the close of all the evidence, was circumstantial. There were many…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Wittkowsky v. WassonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Williams v. Camp Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Smith v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Blackman v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by12 opinions
- Godfrey v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- North State Finance Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Godfrey v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . SwitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Southwell v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.