Legal Opinion
Meiselman v. Byrom
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2002No. 99 CV 3585PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
On June 24, 1999, the plaintiff, Annette Meiselman (“Meiselman” or the “plaintiff’) commenced this action by filing a complaint in which she raised two claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”): excessive force and an unreasonable search. In particular, Meiselman claimed that on September 18, 1997, when Police Officer Eric Byrom (“Byrom”) arrested her for driving with a suspended license, he used excessive force in that he placed and kept handcuffs on her that were too tight. Meiselman also alleged that when she asked Byrom to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Norman L. Birl v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patsy's Italian Restaurant, Inc. v. BanasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. GarciaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
- Meiselman v. ByromCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- ASO, LLC, SHERWANI v. BEN JAMILDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.