Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Grand Junction Sugar Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 21, 1925No. 11,159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

For convenience we hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as the assessor and defendant in error as the company.

The assessor fixed the valuation of the company’s plant for 1921, for purposes of taxation, and the company filed objections thereto. Those objections were overruled. The company paid the tax and appealed to the district court. The assessor moved to dismiss for failure to comply with the statute governing such appeals, and the motion was sustained. The company came here on error and the cause was reversed and remanded for trial. Grand Junction Sugar Co. v. Fellows, 74 Colo. 242,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Trust Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Grand Junction Sugar Co. v. FellowsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. City & County of Denver v. LewinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Phillips v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Merchandise of Hover Motors, Inc. v. Hover Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API