Herbert v. Boardman
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarrow, J.
All of the parties to the action below have appealed the findings and judgment order, the plaintiff asserting his recovery to be too little and the defendants claiming he is entitled to none at all, or, if any, against the corporate defendant only. A counterclaim raised below was denied but no error in this respect is briefed.
As will later appear, reversal and remand is required in any event because the trial court, when it amended its original findings, failed to amend its judgment order to correspond therewith. The issues involved, however, are presented clearly enough for resolution…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevens v. CROSS ABBOTT COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- Koerber v. Middlesex CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Economou v. Vermont Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Central Vermont Public Service Corporation v. Harold Herbert and Edith HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- CW&P Condominium v. PelkeyVermont Superior Court · 2017
- Ortiz Muñoz Y Otros v. Rivera Martínez Y OtrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2007
- Ortiz Muñoz v. Rivera MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2007