Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of defendant’s motion, given defendant’s criminal history, disciplinary record while incarcerated and failure to successfully complete drug treatment for drug abuse (see People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [2006], Iv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]).

Defendant also claims, and the People agree, that a DNA databank fee should not have been imposed at the time of the underlying conviction because the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation providing for the imposition of the fee.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. MarchenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API