Legal Opinion

Willis v. Bryan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Davis. Tried below before tbe Eon. E. P. Mabry. The returns held to be insufficient are stated in the head note.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

We find, on inspection of the record in this case, that the service of citation is fatally defective. There were two defendants sued, and it does not appear, either from the original return of the sheriff, or his amendment thereto, that service was properly made on but one of them, and which one it is impossible to tell.

The defendant McAlpine died before judgment, and judgment by default was taken against Willis. Upon the authority of Roberts v. Stockslager, 4 Tex., 307, and Covington v. Burleson, 28 Tex., 368, the judgment must be reversed on error, which is accordingly done, and cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Covington v. BurlesonTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  2. McDowell v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API