Legal Opinion
Bowe-Burke Mining Co. v. Willcuts
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1930No. 1762PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
This cause came on to bo tried before Judge Cant on the 16th day of December, 1929. Owing to the indisposition of Judge Cant, counsel in this ease have very considerately consented that it be decided by me upon the record and briefs heretofore filed.
This suit is brought by the same plaintiffs against the same defendant, to recover the same taxes as in a former suit in this court, No. 1574 Law, 22 F.(2d) 204. In the former ease, the judgment was in favor of the defendant. Grounds for recovery of the tax asserted in this case are different; namely, that the profits taxed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Werlein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
- Guettel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Pettengill v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Cordle v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- Beck Chemical Equipment Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.