Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Friedell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1943No. 33,561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henry M. Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order overruling his demurrer to defendant’s answer as not stating “facts sufficient to constitute either a defense or counterclaim.” The court certified the question to be “important and doubtful.”

This action was brought to renew a personal judgment entered January 30, 1933, for $5,459.12. The complaint alleges “that no part thereof has ever been paid except the sum of $3,614.10 paid thereon by execution and sale” on April 2, 1941. The amended answer admits the entry of judgment against defendant, but alleges by way of avoidance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Stearns v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. St. Paul Trust & Savings Bank v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Brennan v. FriedellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. RiopelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Guidarelli v. LazarettiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. General Underwriters, Inc. v. KlineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Jallo v. JalloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API