Legal Opinion
Finance Security Co. v. Williams
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1949No. 3144PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The principal complaint of counsel for Smit and Dillard seems to be to the ruling of the court on the merits wherein it is held that the validity vel non of the chattel mortgage was of no concern to their clients as their liability did not arise out of the chattel mortgage on the automobile but was purely statutory and arose out of their failure to have procured the affidavit required by Section 8 of Act No. 172 of 1944.
Counsel states that that point was not raised in the pleadings and neither in brief nor in argument before the court. Whilst it is true that it was not made an issue in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lieber v. WattsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Southland Securities Co. v. ThiemeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- General Finance Co. of Louisiana v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Carson Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Brumfield v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Eschete v. EscheteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- The Marshall National Bank and J.L. Clark v. Norwel Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986