Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

The only question in this case is whether there was a lawful seizure of the slot machines so that they could properly be received in evidence. The state contends that the officers were lawfully on the premises under sec. 139.06, Stats., which provides as follows:

“The state treasurer or his duly authorized employees, and any sheriff, policeman, marshal, or constable, within their respective jurisdictions, may at all reasonable hours enter in and upon any licensed premises, and examine the books, papers and records of any brewer, bottler, sales company, wholesaler, or retailer, for the purpose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Elder v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. State v. Edward FalgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. State v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Wojtycski v. HanleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. CoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API