Cardenas v. Kurpjuweit
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
We granted review of the Court of Appeals decision to determine whether a landowner's claim of a prescriptive easement will be defeated as a matter of law because the landowner has labored under the mistaken view that the ingress-egress to her property was over a road which was open to the public.
PART I
The facts which underlie this dispute are sufficiently set out in the Court of Appeals decision and an illustrative sketch is found of the involved properties and the roadway in question is found at 114 Idaho at 81, and at 753 P.2d at 293. Briefly stated, the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Simmons v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Flynn v. KorsackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Matter of Estate of KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dunbar v. HeinrichWashington Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Hughes v. George B. Fisher, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Hodgins v. SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Bumgarner v. BumgarnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Floyd v. BOARD OF COM'RS BONNEVILLE COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.