Legal Opinion
Hoagland v. Cooper
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 22, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magie, Chancellor.
This case was brought to a hearing upon a bill, an answer of some of the defendants, and a statement of facts agreed upon by the solicitors of the ¡complainants and the answering defendants.
The bill is died by two complainants, viz., Charles Hoagland, substituted administrator of the last will and testament of Benjamin B. Cooper, deceased, and Charles Cooper, claiming an interest under said will and as one of the next of kin of said testator.
It appears by the case as presented that Benjamin B. Cooper, who died in July, 1868, left a last will and codicils, which were proved…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chipman v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Wager v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Monarque v. . MonarqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Dill v. . WisnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RoestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Paterson v. CurrierNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Matlock v. MatlockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Ricardo v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.