Lake Erie, Alliance & Wheeling Rd. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
While a connection between the railroads is the avowed object of the proceeding, this record discloses that the true purpose of this controversy is the desire to share in the coal car supply of the New York Central Railroad. The applicant railroad company, in its 60 miles of length, has at least six other connections.
The complainant railroad and coal companies, together with others, in order to attain their purpose, made application to the Interstate Commerce Commission for a physical connection between plaintiff in error’s railroad at Hopedale, Ohio, and the lines of the Pittsburgh & West…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People Ex Rel. New York Central Railroad v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Jackson & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Overholser v. National Home for Disabled Volunteer SoldiersOhio Supreme Court · 1903
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Davega-City Radio, Inc. v. State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Fuller, Trustee v. RockOhio Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.