Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1953No. 14327_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
Upon consideration, the petitidrt of ap-pellee for rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause is hereby denied.
This Court has heretofore allowed attorney’s fees directly on motion filed by the attorney for the claimant and in accordance with 33 U.S.C.A. § 928. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 128 F.2d 1019; Radcliff Gravel Co. v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 138 F.2d 549. In eSich of those cases, however, the judgment of the District Court was affirmed; while in the present case, the judgment is i-eversed and remanded for further proceedings not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Radcliff Gravel Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seismograph Service Corp. v. Offshore Raydist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Texas Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Seismograph Service Corporation v. Offshore Raydist, Inc., and Hastings Instrument Company, Inc., (Two Cases). Offshore Raydist, Inc., and Hastings Instrument Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Seismograph Service Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- United States ex rel. Caldwell Foundry & Machine Co. v. Texas Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.